Revamped Big East not Dean’s List material
Published: Monday, March 12, 2012
Updated: Monday, August 27, 2012 16:08
The Big East announced that it will expand for the second time since the 2005-06 season when DePaul, among others, was added to the conference.
The latest expansion comes after several other major conferences, including the Pac-10, Big Ten, Big 12 and Atlantic Coastal Conference (ACC) have either added or lost teams within the past year in what has become a rampant reshuffling of intercollegiate conferences.
The Big East has been on both sides of the conference kerfuffle trend by losing several key members whom the conference has been intent on replacing to ensure its strength as a major player in big-time-revenue sports.
Just because the Big East conference will be gaining more members does not necessarily mean they will be gaining in prestige. More teams mean more grade data to scrutinize, and it turns out the newcomers don't fare too well academically against current, and the soon-to-be former conference members they will replace.
The new members of the Big East will include the Universities of Memphis, Houston, Central Florida and Southern Methodist University (SMU) as all-sport members. In addition, Boise State, San Diego State and The U.S Naval Academy (Navy) will join as football-only schools.
Navy's move, due to media contract stipulations, will be delayed until 2015. Moreover, the conference is also rumored to be considering Temple as possible addition. The aforementioned schools will be replacing Syracuse (a founding member), and Pittsburgh (member since 1982) and West Virginia, which reached a settlement with the Big East to leave for the Big 12 this July.
The 2012-13 season will be the 34th in Big East history and will also bring with it the largest expansion since its creation in 1979. The conference originally was made up of seven teams: Providence College, St. Johns, Georgetown, Syracuse, Seton Hall, Connecticut and Boston College.
In the 2005-06 season, the Big East became the country's largest Division I-A conference adding five teams including DePaul, Cincinnati, Louisville, Marquette and South Florida. That same year the conference lost Boston College. While membership changes are not uncommon, the 2013 expansion will make the largest conference even larger. Despite losing three teams, the Big East will round the conference off to 20 teams.
On the outset, one would be loath to compare any of the future Big East additions to academic juggernauts already in the conference such as Villanova, Notre Dame and Georgetown. Navy would be the exception here, having already established an infallible and prestigious academic record. And when the schools are compared using academic statistics it becomes more apparent that the Big East has added schools that don't quite match up to the current crop.
To determine whether or not the Big East will be better or worse from an academic standpoint, it serves us well to liken the conference additions and subtractions as a trade in professional sports. Of course, instead of players being exchanged from one team to another, here we are comparing and contrasting certain institutions based on academic statistics including academic progress reports and academic rating.
The NCAA measures schools on an institution's ability to retain and move student-athletes toward graduation using a statistic called the academic progress rate (APR). APR is rated on a sport-by-sport basis. Schools that fail to reach an APR score of at least 925 (equivalent to a 50 percent graduation rate) are penalized by the NCAA with the loss of scholarships. A perfect score is 1000.
Soon to be departed West Virginia was second in 2009-10 men's basketball APR with a score of 995. Pittsburgh also posted an impressive 985, while Syracuse earned only a 928 rating. Among the soon-to-be-added schools, Memphis boasted an impressive APR score of 989, the highest among new Big East schools. However, other incoming Big East schools didn't do as well as Memphis for men's basketball APR. SMU posted an APR score of 946, while UCF came dangerously close to the 925 cutoff with a 929; and Houston scored a 907 which would make them second-to-last in men's hoops APR in the Big East (UConn's 893 APR score was last).
The football-only schools were not so bad. For instance, Boise and Navy achieved a 981 and 978, respectively in APR football scores for 2009-10. On the other hand, San Diego St. had a lower score of 934.
So in terms of men's basketball APR, the Big East will suffer a setback with the loss of West Virginia and Pittsburgh. However, they will be glad to welcome the schools who posted impressive scores like Memphis, as well as SMU and Navy for football. UCF and especially Houston certainly drag the conference down a notch or two with their less-than-impressive, and in Houston's case failing, APR scores.
Although DePaul is sad to see long-time members Syracuse, Pittsburgh and West Virginia leave, it welcomes with open arms the new schools, viewing the expansion as entirely positive for both DePaul and the conference.
"Every time the Big East has reinvented itself, it has turned out better," said DePaul Athletic Director Jean Lenti Ponsetto.
Ponsetto also added that she is eager to renew relationships with schools DePaul has dealt with in the past. One of these schools is Memphis, who like DePaul in 2005-06, will be departing Conference USA for the Big East.
"All schools, each in their own way, bring something special to the conference," added Ponsetto.