Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Kenmore closure a greater task than expected

Published: Saturday, October 13, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 01:10

kenmore green meeting

Matthew Smith

Alderman Waguespeck at a meeting Thursday, Oct. 11 to discuss the permanent closure of Kenmore Avenue.

kenmore ave

Elizabeth Schuetz

A meeting was held Oct. 11 at the Arts and Letters Building to discuss the possibility of closing Kenmore Avenue in the near future.

Emotions ran high during a DePaul University community meeting held Thursday to discuss DePaul’s proposed Kenmore Green project.

Members of the community packed into the 103 auditorium in the Arts & Letters building in order to hear conclusions from DePaul, the Chicago Department of Transportation and the companies responsible for the study and planning of the project.

Allan Mellis of the Wrightwood Neighbors Association was one of the more vocal opponents to the plan.

“Tonight, I have not heard any mitigation to the parking issue, or the traffic flow issue associated with this plan,” said Mellis. “We are asking that DePaul continues to be a good neighbor to us, as we have to you”.

The project, which was initially part of DePaul’s 2009 Master Plan, would close Kenmore Avenue between Fullerton and Belden Avenues in order to create a pedestrian mall and green space. The project would eliminate 47 unregulated and free parking spaces on the street, much of which is utilized by DePaul students and faculty.

Many community members expressed concern that the elimination of these spaces would push the commuting students to park on other streets near campus and further exasperate the already frustrating parking situation in the densely populated neighborhood.

Another concern was the impact to the traffic at Sheffield and Fullerton, which is already a bottleneck and could be compounded by the closure of Kenmore. The study conducted by the firms Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona Incorporated found that the intersection was the most congested in the study area, especially during the morning peak hour.

KLOA submitted improvements at the forum in order to mitigate these issues, such as adding dedicated right turn lanes at the Fullerton and Sheffield intersection, and adding left turn lanes on the west, at Racine and Fullerton.

“Kenmore carries a relatively low volume of traffic. Sheffield and Clifton can absorb the traffic easily, especially if our modifications were implemented,” said KLOA principal Eric Russell.

Marty Oberman, a former Lincoln Park alderman, spoke out in favor of the plan, calling suggestions that DePaul would close other streets in the area if allowed to close Kenmore “scare tactics.”

“We live in a dense city. If you could solve the traffic and parking situation in Lincoln Park, you could be alderman for life,” said Oberman. “There’s always going to be traffic, there’s always going to be trouble parking. But when we overall enhance on-campus life, we enhance our neighborhood.”

32nd ward Alderman Scott Waguespack was also on hand to field questions from constituents, and he expressed frustration with the city since the ward redistricting would place DePaul in Michele Smith’s ward.

“The mayor has given us zero indication as to when (the redistricting) is going to happen, and the aldermen are left in flux,” said Waguespack.

“Michele’s and our ward have been working very closely together. We are going to gather all the information…and deal with it at the individual level,” said Waguespack.

According to Joe Antunovich, a representative from the architecture firm handling the Kenmore Green project, the project could potentially be completed within two or three years, at a cost to be determined. As a part of the project, the Seminary Hall townhomes that line the northeast corner of Kenmore and Fullerton would be replaced with a larger scale dormitory that would “keep the tradition and the style of the surrounding neighborhood,” said Antunovich.

DePaul would end up footing the bill for the project, not the taxpayer, said Kozoman. DePaul has already paid for improvements in the area, such as the pedestrian countdown signals at Fullerton and Sheffield and the high-visibility crosswalks at Belden and Sheffield Avenue.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments

Anonymous
Tue Oct 16 2012 10:46
Thank you for your well-rounded article. This issue has many implications, but the obvious two remain to be: 1) where exactly are those 47 cars going to park once the area is closed? I suspect in front of my house; and 2) since Sheffield is already a "bottleneck", why would anyone want to do anything to make the bottleneck worse?

I live nearbvy and just want those two questions answered. Alderman Oberman says that we already have traffic problems and dismisses that impact, but as a retired alderman, will he be directly affected by this? He is obviously not worried about re-election because the great majority of people attending that meeting raised their hands firmly against this project.

Secondly, they cite safety issues there, but has there ever been an accident on that street involving a student crossing the streeet? My guess is that cars parked end-to-end there discourage students from crossig mid-street and get them to go to the crosswalks. Also, since emergency vehicles still need access down that street and so a path (also known as a street) still need to be there? If so, then the only thing they are doing is to remove the cars - and force those cars to take up parking on my street. I don't like that at all.

Maybe I would be more inclined to like this plan if DePaul knocked down one of their buildings in the middle of campus for a parking lot - away from Sheffield so that would funnel traffic to another area thus decreasing the Sheffield bottleneck.

The other idea is to make all streets surrounding DePaul a 24 Hour Permit-Only Zone (new number, not 143) and force DePaul to deal with their students parking issues. Furthermore, with Bus 11 directly serving DePaul campus and it is being cancelled, there will likely be a significant increase in more staff and student driving to campus. Where will they park?





log out